We've seen errors this big before. Best to not get too excited until there is a replication. Based on history, every time there has been an amazing result like this, it has turned out to be either a huge mistake, unreplicable, or fraudulent (I don't suspect fraud at all in this case). I hope I'm wrong, and the issue has been solved once and for all. How many times have people failed to replicate Mizuno and/or shown his results to be in error in the past? This is not a criticism, but a call for tempered expectations.
Jack On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 1:32 PM Dave Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > > *From: *Dave Roberson <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Friday, June 28, 2019 1:40 PM > *To: *[email protected] > *Subject: *RE: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake > > > > Interesting results. One question I have is what material is used as a > gasket between the end flanges and the SS reaction chamber? It is hard to > believe that nothing is required to prevent leaks. > > > > Dave > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > > With further reading I see that some thin gasket was used. I answered my > own question. Of course the type of material is very critical for anyone > wanting to replicate the experiment. > > > > Dave >
