>>Thoughts?<<
there are problems combining relativity (especially general relativity) with
quantum physics, so when people try to talk from things combining them then
they are not on solid ground.
>From my point-of-view relativity has been mistranslated and misunderstood so
>false claims are made about it. My latest video-I think it was mainly written
>by his wife.
On Wednesday, 3 June 2020, 17:25:51 BST, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quantum Non-locality explained by Sabine
Hossenfelderhttps://youtu.be/XL9wWeEmQvo
I disagree with the conclusion that non-locality cannot be used to send an FLT
message. What is overlooked is that an indeterminate state, i.e. unmeasured
state is also a type of information.
If the transmitter and the receiver have synchronised clocks (which is possible
in SR) then the transmitter can send a message by a sequence of binary choices:
either measure or not measure the particle's spin in the diagonal direction at
a given time. What the receiver detects will be meaningfully informed by the
sequence of the transmitter's choices.
Thoughts?
Harry
