On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:30 PM ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> wrote:
> >>Thoughts?<< > > there are problems combining relativity (especially general relativity) > with quantum physics, so when people try to talk from things combining them > then they are not on solid ground. > > I only mentioned SR because it is often wrongly invoked to dismiss any experiment needing simultaneity. On the issue reconciling the two domains of quantum mechanics and SR/GR, instead of trying to change one or the other or both, it might be preferable to accept them as each true within their respective domains and build a bridge between the domains by integrating them technologically instead trying to merge them into a single mathematical theory. Harry > From my point-of-view relativity has been mistranslated and misunderstood > so false claims are made about it. My latest video-I think it was mainly > written by his wife. > > > > > > On Wednesday, 3 June 2020, 17:25:51 BST, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Quantum Non-locality explained by Sabine Hossenfelder > https://youtu.be/XL9wWeEmQvo > > I disagree with the conclusion that non-locality cannot be used to send an > FLT message. What is overlooked is that an indeterminate state, i.e. > unmeasured state is also a type of information. > > If the transmitter and the receiver have synchronised clocks (which is > possible in SR) then the transmitter can send a message by a sequence of > binary choices: either measure or not measure the particle's spin in the > diagonal direction at a given time. What the receiver detects will be > meaningfully informed by the sequence of the transmitter's choices. > > Thoughts? > > Harry > >
