Presented now is a video that shows the energy release from an EVO at termination via the Bosenova.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBQYArxDrdg Bosenova production in slow motion VEGA - 240fps + 8x slow motion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VuO7iYzyT8&t=155s The production of EVO in slow motion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU7v4Yy_QGw On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 5:05 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Naked singularities are not related to gravitational black holes. These > micro black holes are a consequence of tachyon condensation. Ashoke Sen > took the fear out of tachyons for physicists when he characterized tachyon > condensation. In the late 1990s, Ashoke Sen conjectured that the tachyons > carried by open strings attached to D-branes in string theory reflect the > instability of the D-branes with respect to their complete annihilation. > The total energy carried by these tachyons has been calculated in string > field theory; it agrees with the total energy of the D-branes, and all > other tests have confirmed Sen's conjecture as well. Tachyons therefore > became an active area of interest in the early 2000s. OK, so open-string > tachyons and closed-string tachyons in twisted sectors are more or less > understood by now. Physicists no longer panic or abandon the theory when > they see a tachyon. Instead, they calmly interpret these tachyons as > sources of instabilities – instability that annihilate objects or whole > chunks of spacetime and that may (but don't necessarily have to) lead to a > new stable world with some interesting objects that may be left over. For > this reason, it was Ashoke Sen and his apprentices such as Edward Witten > who unified nothingness and somethingness in physics – i.e. in string > theory (because no other theory can achieve similar unifications) – and who > discovered new perspectives on the somethingness in between and that's my > explanation why both Sen and Witten deserves their $3 million Breakthrough > prizes. I am interested in relating the abstractions of string theory to > real world engineering applications. I want to know the ways and means of > how these naked singularities annihilate objects or whole chunks of > spacetime and that may lead to new stable conditions with some interesting > transformed objects that may be left over. > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:18 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Holmlid new paper legwork by can >> >> *Title:* “Production of ultra-dense hydrogen H(0): A novel nuclear fuel” >> >> Date: >> >> 26 March 2021 >> >> *Authors:* Leif Holmlid, Andrzej Kotarba, Pawel Stelmachowski. >> >> *Link:* >> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319921008144?via%3Dihub#! >> >> >> Some LENR-relevant excerpts from the paper: >> >> [...] It is possible to have an energy output by forming H(0) from >> hydrogen gas. This condensation energy will easily be believed to be >> non-chemical thus nuclear due to its size (of the order of hundred times >> larger than normal chemical energy output). It may be a large part of the >> energy which is considered to be caused by so-called cold fusion, as >> suggested previously by Winterberg [6,7]. Other nuclear reactions in H(0) >> may be the main processes considered to be cold fusion, with very little of >> normal fusion products like 4He and neutrons out. >> So-called cold fusion according to Fleischmann and Pons [8] is probably >> due to the condensation reactions of H(0) as mentioned above and also due >> to the spontaneous nuclear processes which take place in H(0) [9]. Such >> spontaneous nuclear processes are similar to those induced by pulsed lasers >> [[10], [11], [12]] which do not give 4He and neutrons as products but >> instead give mesons, especially charged and neutral kaons [[13], [14], >> [15]]. Thus, these processes are not fusion processes. The mesons formed >> have lifetimes of less than 100 ns. Most often, it is the decay of the >> mesons which can be studied easily, giving high-accuracy lifetimes in >> agreement with those measured at large accelerators [16]. Since almost all >> mesons formed (kaons and pions) decay to muons which have a much longer >> lifetime of 2.20 μs, the muons have been detected easily [[12], [13], [14], >> [15],18], and also confirmed separately [15]. The sources of mesons and >> muons obtained in this way are the strongest that exist and they can be >> operated with high energy efficiency and at a low cost. >> >> These meson producing processes are very similar for H(0) and D(0). This >> means that many early experiments on cold fusion which aimed at finding the >> true contribution of fusion by comparing experiments using deuterium with >> similar experiments using ordinary hydrogen were meaningless. The nuclear >> reactions in H(0) are instead annihilation-like processes [19]. The tragic >> un-scientific processes which took place after the report of “cold fusion”, >> aimed to block all research on “cold fusion”, have damaged science and >> especially the reputation of science in society. Now when the pieces of >> knowledge of these processes are falling into place, it is time to >> acknowledge that only more science-based rationales can be used to solve >> such scientific problems, not denials and political or personal persecution. >> >> >> My comments >> >> In both the Holmlid and Mills technology, the key gateway into the LENR >> reaction is the creation of a superconducting nanoparticle. This >> superconductive seed triggers the conversion of electrons into tachyons >> that when condensed generate a false vacuum which in turn catalyzes the >> extraction of energy from the vacuum. >> >> A side non energy producing reaction generates transmutation via a >> tachyon catalyzed naked singularity as described by Witten. Connecting >> energy production with transmutation is the biggest misconception that has >> undercut the understanding of LENR. These two concurrent processes are >> completely independent related to energy production. >> >> Energy production only occurs when the condensate is terminated via a >> Bosenova. >> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:07 AM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 9:20 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Bob, >>>> >>>> Yes. Lets hear where this comes from. >>>> >>>> IMO this is completely fake insofar as it relates to Shoulders' work. >>>> >>> >>> Reminds me of "rods" >>> >>> https://www.thecryptocrew.com/2015/05/rods-real-or-bugs.html >>> >>
