----- Original Message -----
From: "Frederick Sparber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: Electrogravity & Proton Repulsion of Electrons
Michel Jullian wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frederick Sparber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: Electrogravity & Proton Repulsion of Electrons
> One Microvolt in experimental error means 593 meters/second
> delta v in electron velocity. No?
Er, why Fred? I thought we were measuring times, not voltages?
The gravity upward repulsive force (if it exists) would give an electron
an upward force F = mg = 9.1e-31 kg*9.8 meters/sec^2 = 8.9e-30 newtons.
Velocity = vo + 9.8 * t
Distance S traversed = vo + 1/2 * 9.8 * t^2
You mean vo*t + 1/2 * 9.8 * t^2
So, to keep the chamber in the one to two meter length.
For 1 = vo + 9.8*t^2 for vo = 0 t = 1/9.8)^1/2 = 0.319 seconds
or 0.452 seconds for a two meter tube.
Thus velocity v = vo + 9.8*t cannot be over ~ 3.2 meters/second.
You mean under???
A Femto-Coulomb range Electrometer can detect 65,000 electrons
or more trapped on a plate (saucer) in a faraday cup.
http://www.keithley.com/products/locurrhiresist/electrometers?mn=6517A
Fred I don't see why you would need such a contraption, there is no need to
trap the electrons, let them flow in an inexpensive power supply and look at
the current pulses!
A time
difference in my last proposal, but admittedly I haven't done any error
analysis, it just looked sound to me to only look for a time difference
proportional to the effect.
Not an easy task, huh?
Quite easy with two back to back devices in the same tube and a scope
triggered by one current pulse and watching the other I would have thought,
what's wrong with the approach?
>
> I vote for a vacuum version of Stokes' " upward aerosol settling
> velocity".
> :-)
Well, it's your Thought Experiment ;)
Cheaper than those Keithleys and a vacuum system. :-)
Oh yes!
Michel
Fred
