Terry wrote: > ... others have confirmed > the measurements since your conjecture.
Hi Terry, have the splendid overunity COPs you mentioned in recent posts been confirmed by the same expert who measured a COP of 0.25 on an earlier version? (*) Michel (*) It was Arkansas Power Electronics International, Inc. I just dug out their emilie_analysis_coil2_webversion.pdf report you pointed us to earlier this year, here is what it said: ------- This report outlines the test results of the new coil and core and illustrates comparisons to the original coil and core when appropriate. Overall, there is a measured improvement in performance when compared to the first coil and core, but the efficiency range of ~25% is still low in comparison with industry electric motors. ------ Didn't Sprain already think he had overunity when he bought that analysis in 2002 BTW? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 1:07 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Interesting News About Steorn > On 11/28/06, Michel Jullian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Indeed it does. >> >> Hi Terry, for another opinion Stephen could have a look at the controversy >> you and I had about this some time ago, I had found what looked very much >> like a large error in input current measurement by analysing the Mosfet's >> voltage waveform and applying Ohm's low to it knowing it's ON resistance >> (search for Sprain in the list archive). > > Of course he may do so if he wishes; however, others have confirmed > the measurements since your conjecture. In addition, the modification > to a four magnet rotor showed the anticipated effect on COP. Face it > mon ami, a magnetic gradient can do real work. > > Did you read the paper on spin consciousness that I posted on earlier? > > Terry >
