David Thomson wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
>> No, the "thugs" are concerned about the release of advanced technology.
>> You're thinking of the science community,
>
> There is technically no such thing as "advanced technology" that is not
> defined as "science that works."
Advanced technology is leading edge technology.
> The imagined "thugs" are no more than scientists asking you to put up or
> shut up.
No, my definition of thugs is people working for the cause to suppress
technology considered dangerous in the hands of terrorists or rogue countries
such as Iran or North Korea.
> Either you can demonstrate that your "research" adheres to all the
> known science laws, and then improves on them, or you cannot.
All measuring devices have input capacitance. When you measure thermal noise
for instance you are viewing a capacitor that was charged by such thermal noise.
If that breaks your laws of physics then so be it. It does not break any laws
by my understanding of physics.
> You ought to be careful; you are starting to sound like a conspiracy
> theorist with an imaginary agenda.
>
No, I go by the laws of probability. In Unix security world there's a well
known Mandrake install mode called paranoid mode. An SA is wise to install a
Unix server in such a mode. From my POV it is called cheap insurance. The U.S.
military does not want weapons of mass destruction in the hands of terrorists or
rogue countries. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that an half
intelligent group would use simple tactics to suppress technology that may lead
to such weapons of mass destruction. I'm a little surprised in your comments
since IMHO they show very little foresight and intelligence.
Are you the guy with the Aether theory of everything? If so then when are you
going to start on the list provided in another thread? I think the single
electron double slit experiment would be a great start.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
