Iwamura results with pressure loading only: interesting qualitatively but they 
don't achieve a sufficient reaction rate for detectable excess heat. You need a 
high D/Pd loading ratio (~1) for that, or so I understand, and they don't have 
it. Their ICCF12 paper indicates in Fig.11 a D density nD of 2*10^22 per cm3 
for their best Pd complex. One cm3 of Pd is 12g --density 12.0--, which is 
12/106.4=0.11 mole --molar mass 106.4g--, which is 0.11*6*10^23 atoms i.e. a Pd 
density of 6.6*10^22 atoms per cm3, so this would be a D/Pd of only 2/6.6=0.3 
if I am not mistaken, far from unity.

Double layer modelling at the atomic level, I meant "does the geometry I used 
in my 3D model sound plausible to you"? Does the Bockris book describe the 
detailed geometry of the Pd atoms/ excess electron layer / water molecules / 
electrolyte protons assembly? I'll post a more elaborated description of my 
semi-educated guess for that geometry in the relevant thread, where your 
comments will be welcome.

Face Centered Cubic metals dimensions: nice compilation! I used almost the same 
figures as the standard ones you have listed for Pd, only a bit larger to allow 
for the slight expansion due to the loading (I used 0.4 nm for the unit cube 
side, yielding 0.283nm pitch between Pd atoms along the cube face's diagonals  
--your figure for the bond length is 2.75 A = 0.275 nm, not significantly 
different-- ).

Michel


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Horace Heffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 5:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Deflation Fusion - Thermal Cycling and High Temperature 
Alloys



On Aug 27, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Michel Jullian wrote:

> Hi Horace, lots of sensible contributions as usual, I wonder how  
> many of you there are ? ;-) Let's call a truce in our ongoing  
> controversy for a while.

Sounds good to me. It is mostly only relevant to Figure 1 and  
associated text of my little paper anyway.


>
> You mention high pressure or high voltage hydrogen loading, do you  
> think you can compete with the ~10^26 atmospheres loading achieved  
> by electrolysis?  :-)

I don't think that it is necessary to compete with electrolysis  
loading.   Consider the fact Iwamura used pressure loading only:

Iwamural et al, “OBSERVATION OF LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTIONS INDUCED  
BY D2 GAS PERMEATION THROUGH PD COMPLEXES”,The Ninth International  
Conference on Cold Fusion, 2002. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University,
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IwamuraYobservatioa.pdf

Iwamural et al, “OBSERVATION OF LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTIONS INDUCED  
BY D2 GAS PERMEATION THROUGH PD COMPLEXES”,The Eleventh International  
Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science, 2004. Marseille,  
Francehttp://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IwamuraYobservatiob.pdf

and Dufour (stunningly!) used only the tiny amount of hydrogen  
already in the Uranium matrix:

Dufour, J., et al.,”EXPERIMENTAL OBSERVATION OF NUCLEAR REACTIONS IN  
PALLADIUM AND URANIUM — POSSIBLE EXPLANATION BY HYDREX MODE”, Dec 2001,
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DufourJexperiment.pdf

I don't take the Dufour results as necessarily credible without  
replication, but I certainly can't discredit them either.




>
> Speaking of which, your comments on my piccies would be welcome, is  
> the metal-electrolyte interface plausibly modelled at the atomic  
> level do you think?


Yes.  It has been described in great detail by Bockris and Reddy,  
*Modern Electrochemistry*, Plenum/Rosetta edition, 1973, ISBN  
0-306-25001-2, a two volume paperback set, which includes the  
tunneling equations.


> I may have not looked hard enough but I couldn't find any realistic  
> view of the double layer in Google Images, people tend to  
> schematize the hydrated ions as separate entities all right, but  
> the metal surface is always shown as an idealized flat plate  
> whereas in fact its atoms are not smaller than the water molecules  
> (they are of exactly equal size in the case of Palladium  
> incidentally, which may be significant)


I don't know if you are aware of it, but I provided at least  
approximate geometry figures for various FCC metals at:

http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/CCP.pdf

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/

Reply via email to