Now this won't do Richard, no reference at all to the Dime Box Saloon!? ;-) Fortunately, your thought-provoking "when you are looking thru a window without walls.. are you looking out.. or looking in?" makes up for this omission :-)
Seriously, I am glad that you seem to support the #CF hypothesis. Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "R.C.Macaulay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 2:37 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: #CF hypothesis (was Re: surface electron layer catalyzed fusion hypothesis) > > Robin wrote.. >>It can't be any more than the chemical binding energy of hydrogen to the >>lattice. A few eV at most. > > Howdy Robin, > Back to high school physics so I can understand your premise. Take an > analogy for example. > > A piece of pure copper rod 1/4 inch in diameter at ambient temperature > suddenly bent 90 degree with produce heat sufficent to burn your finger > depending on how rapid the movement. What does that indicate? A transfer of > energy from one form to another..?? or .. is something else involved we > simply are not aware of? Or a combination ? It's the combination that leads > to chasing rabbits. > > The transfer of energy can take some strange twists and the strangest of all > is not when heat is produced ..but.. when heat is removed.. Give that mind > teaser some thought and then re-examine your premise regarding the CF > hypothesis .In other words.. when you are looking thru a window without > walls.. are you looking out.. or looking in? > > Richard >
