Is a balloon expelling gas a suitable analogue? Harry
On 30/9/2007 3:17 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: > Yes, much better, thank you. Elastic constriction expulsion. All that is > needed now is to translate this to eV :-) > > Michel > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 10:31 AM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: #CF hypothesis (was Re: surface electron layer catalyzed > fusion hypothesis) > > > If, as you say below, the deuteron is 'expelled' then wouldn't it be more > consistent to say 'expulsion' instead of 'propulsion'? > > Harry > > > On 30/9/2007 1:16 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: > >> I guess you mean venturi in relation with the flow restriction. >> >> Following Harry's remark in the spin thread, how about "elastic constriction >> propulsion"? >> >> Seriously, anyone got an idea of how much energy this can put into the >> expelled deuteron or how it could be calculated? >> >> Michel >> >> P.S. Tsss, "Could it get us to Uranus", can't get over this one Terry :-) >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jones Beene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 4:39 PM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: #CF hypothesis (was Re: surface electron layer >> catalyzed >> fusion hypothesis) >> >> >> Ha! "sphincter propulsion" Luv it... >> >> ... don't think anyone has evoked that exact wording before, but lest >> the skeptics out there latch-onto to something derogatory like >> "toilet-fizzix", can we just call it "venturi propulsion" or something a >> little less organic? >> >> Jones >> >> Michel Jullian wrote: >>> (#CF = DIESECF Desorbing-Incident Excess Surface Electron Catalyzed Fusion, >>> # >>> being "dièse" in French) >>> >>> As I suggested to someone in a private message a few weeks ago, I think the >>> desorbing deuteron must have more energy than that due to its free fall in >>> the electron layer's electric field, in the form of a "sphincter >>> contraction" >>> like expulsion energy (sorry for the gruesome image). This would be due to >>> the elastic nature of the Pd crystal which could be expected to re-contract >>> locally with the participation of a large number of surface Pd atoms after >>> the deuteron's passage. This kinetic energy could be a welcome complement to >>> the electron layer's screening effect. >>> >>> This complementary effect could explain why CF occurs with Pd and D, with Ni >>> (tighter lattice) and H (protium), but not (or less) e.g. with Pd and H, >>> because the smaller protium would flow "too easily" (with less sphincter >>> propulsion) out of the relatively roomy Pd lattice. >>> >>> Hope this makes some sense. Do let me know anyone if this sphincter aspect >>> of >>> hydrogen nuclei expulsion has been evoked before and/or quantified. >>> >>> Michel >>> >>> P.S. Of course the whole hypothesis, which I have presented in essentially >>> classical terms (my apologies to "real" theoreticians for that), will have >>> to >>> be translated to quantum physics language and quantified before it can be >>> considered a proper theory. This will be done IF --big if-- it is confirmed >>> experimentally, there being obviously little point in theorizing further if >>> it is proved wrong. >
