wouldn't the ball ultimately loose energy to the lattice as it squirts out?
Harry On 2/10/2007 8:38 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: > Mmmm... more like a tennis ball in a tight lattice of basketballs pressed > against each other, with the elastic constrictions of the lattice (the > passages between the interstitial sites and ultimately towards the surface) > smaller than the ball. The ball, pushed from behind by other balls, squirts > out. > > Michel > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 8:32 PM > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: #CF hypothesis (was Re: surface electron layer catalyzed > fusion hypothesis) > > > Is a balloon expelling gas a suitable analogue? > > Harry > > On 30/9/2007 3:17 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: > >> Yes, much better, thank you. Elastic constriction expulsion. All that is >> needed now is to translate this to eV :-) >> >> Michel >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Harry Veeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 10:31 AM >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: #CF hypothesis (was Re: surface electron layer >> catalyzed >> fusion hypothesis) >> >> >> If, as you say below, the deuteron is 'expelled' then wouldn't it be more >> consistent to say 'expulsion' instead of 'propulsion'? >> >> Harry >> >> >> On 30/9/2007 1:16 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: >> >>> I guess you mean venturi in relation with the flow restriction. >>> >>> Following Harry's remark in the spin thread, how about "elastic constriction >>> propulsion"? >>> >>> Seriously, anyone got an idea of how much energy this can put into the >>> expelled deuteron or how it could be calculated? >>> >>> Michel >>> >>> P.S. Tsss, "Could it get us to Uranus", can't get over this one Terry :-) >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Jones Beene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 4:39 PM >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: #CF hypothesis (was Re: surface electron layer >>> catalyzed >>> fusion hypothesis) >>> >>> >>> Ha! "sphincter propulsion" Luv it... >>> >>> ... don't think anyone has evoked that exact wording before, but lest >>> the skeptics out there latch-onto to something derogatory like >>> "toilet-fizzix", can we just call it "venturi propulsion" or something a >>> little less organic? >>> >>> Jones >>> >>> Michel Jullian wrote: >>>> (#CF = DIESECF Desorbing-Incident Excess Surface Electron Catalyzed Fusion, >>>> # >>>> being "dièse" in French) >>>> >>>> As I suggested to someone in a private message a few weeks ago, I think the >>>> desorbing deuteron must have more energy than that due to its free fall in >>>> the electron layer's electric field, in the form of a "sphincter >>>> contraction" >>>> like expulsion energy (sorry for the gruesome image). This would be due to >>>> the elastic nature of the Pd crystal which could be expected to re-contract >>>> locally with the participation of a large number of surface Pd atoms after >>>> the deuteron's passage. This kinetic energy could be a welcome complement >>>> to >>>> the electron layer's screening effect. >>>> >>>> This complementary effect could explain why CF occurs with Pd and D, with >>>> Ni >>>> (tighter lattice) and H (protium), but not (or less) e.g. with Pd and H, >>>> because the smaller protium would flow "too easily" (with less sphincter >>>> propulsion) out of the relatively roomy Pd lattice. >>>> >>>> Hope this makes some sense. Do let me know anyone if this sphincter aspect >>>> of >>>> hydrogen nuclei expulsion has been evoked before and/or quantified. >>>> >>>> Michel >>>> >>>> P.S. Of course the whole hypothesis, which I have presented in essentially >>>> classical terms (my apologies to "real" theoreticians for that), will have >>>> to >>>> be translated to quantum physics language and quantified before it can be >>>> considered a proper theory. This will be done IF --big if-- it is confirmed >>>> experimentally, there being obviously little point in theorizing further if >>>> it is proved wrong. >> >
