This group overshadows others in the cultivating of an intellectual honesty
toward candid discussion of the technical merits, pitfalls and
inspirational hopes for various new forms of energy.
New energy is an essential for the future and will be achieved by preparing
a solid foundation, a minimum of three legs, a tripod base if you will.
The first pier must be intellectual honesty, identify the minimum two other
piers
Richard
I'm assuming that this pier includes the will to confront intellectual
dishonesty and graft in very blunt terms, if necessary. Once the "attack"
is made, the "counter-attack" should be focused and ruthless. Still
thinking...
Philip W.
Open and free discussion is certainly a necessity. One must not allow those
ideas which one considers to be true to cloud the ability to consider that
the idea might need refinement or, indeed, be flawed. If a claimant says
that a measurement was taken a certain way and was verified by others, a
sceptic who is not a party to the experiment has no right to claim that the
measurement is in error without observation or replication of the exact
experiment.
Terry
Howdy Vorts,
When I started this thread I was searching a thought I had. After reading
these two responses I have considered that both have a particular
insightful clue as to the solution to how to turn the curve in LENR.
If correct, the further responses by others will confirm and a pattern
will emerge. Never underestimate the power of thoughtfully expressed
collective dialogue for others to ponder.
Richard
