The preceding posting was part spoof, as some may have
guessed following Terry's video clip (which BTW was
probably him in person ;-) but also it was part
serious and maybe even visionary. It generated enough
private mail to attempt to correct the details
(eventually) and moreover - is close enough being "in
the ballpark" as a workable concept, to warrant a more
detailed investigation.

Well... let's summarize by saying that the bottom
line, even discounting the spoof part, is already
closer to being accurate than Nanosolar's $1/watt BS.
 
> A-maizing. Yup. The corn justs keeps on a comin'...
> and look at that nice pond site behind Mr Green. 

Instead of a one acre pond, Mr GreenJeans is going to
need a larger spread to power a 1.5 MW-hr gen-set. You
probably guessed that from the Smiley. How large?

Not sure yet, but the factors which were not yet
included are the Carnot efficiency of the Diesel and
the oil-conversion efficiency (raw algae into oil) and
other assorted math errors.

BTW there are claims of algae strains which do better
than 50% solar conversion into lipids (when CO2 and
heat are added)

However the big unknown (in principal) in regard to
converting raw algae biomass into a burnable fuel is
this: for use in a fixed, in situ power plant, one
does not need a transportation grade of fuel. This can
be exploited as a huge advantage using algae fuel in a
system selling only electrical power to the grid.

Consequently, it is possible, if not likely, that a
biomass-to-syngas process, instead of biomass to
biodiesel, is considerably more efficient and cheaper,
than striving for a transportation grade fuel.

The end result would involve powering the diesel with
mostly syngas and some oil for lubrication. Syngas is
mostly carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and mixed NOx
intermediates which are made "on the fly" from the raw
algae biomass. No refining or storage is necessary.

This reforming is accomplished by passing an
electrical current (which is parasitic, but only a few
percent) through the heated mix. This is sometimes
referred to as the AquaFuel or AquaGen processes, but
those are trademarked names. There are many other
versions of the reforming theme, which have been
proved to reform raw biomass into carbon monoxide and
hydrogen efficiently, going back 70 years.

Given that the entire system does not require much
space, aside from the pond, this is a 'natural' for
rural areas where grid losses from a large centralized
plant, which may be hundreds of miles away, are high. 

The power company could probably be induced to assist
with the connections (with a little political
persuasion) since in the long run, this type of
decentralization can (probably) be shown to help them
more than hurt them.

Signed,

Harry 'greener-than-green' Tuttle

Reply via email to