The secret is to eat only the R-tryptophan which has no effect. Eugene addresses the oil company issue in his first reference. He says that Hans Adams has oil interests.
Actually, I would be relieved if Wagner is correct. I am spooked by those strange entanglements called the "Hutchison Effect" and the "Little Effect". Terry On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Terry, > > I strongly and respectfully disagree. We have heard this kind of "sour > grapes" negativism on Vo many times before wrt LENR at EarthTech, but I don't > buy it a minute, and for a number of logical reasons.... > > BTW... I did not miss your "depth charge" (i.e. don't be put-off by a > sub-line pun ;-) > > Anyway ... Trust me! At least for today... > > http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/19741/?nlid=1545 > > First off, it is almost foolish to say, as that person Nori does (is he > really an academic? doubt it!) that "Earthtech's purpose is to willfully > muddy the waters by falsely claiming to be unable to reproduce experiments > that pose a risk to the status quo." > > Idiotic charge! Who would fund willful disinformation? Makes no sense at all > when you think about the ramifications. > > Like anyone else, they can make mistakes, and may have made a few > questionable calls about LENR in the past, or about hydrino systems which > were only slightly OU - but not robust enoguh to be unequivocal, but > "willfull disinformation" is a ridiculous and even slanderous charge. > > First off - how does anyone benefit, even an oil company (if they were behind > EarthTech's funding)? > > No oil company would ever benefit from maintaining the status quo in the face > of a real breakthrough advance, by even a tiny fraction of the net effect of > how they would massively benefit by capitalizing on the advance itself. IOW > they cannot assume that issuing a flase report will kill any project. In > fact, it most probably would motivate the inventor to improve the results and > go elsewhere, and then ET would end up being a laughing-stock and worse. > > IOW they WANT very much to be involved on the ground floor of anything which > is real. With the empahsis on real. But they also want to avoid the mountains > of BS which are to be found in the alternative energy arena. > > Here is a real present tense example to watch in the near future. Keep you > eye on what will happen with the Letts/Cravens/Hagelstein device. > > Dennis Letts, I'm pretty sure, is a neighbor of EarthTech in the Austin area > and knows them better than anyone else, and has his own interests at heart. > Would he be involved with them for testing this device if he thought ET was > some kind of a "false front"? Absolutely NOT! > > If Earthtech finds something that is a genuine robust anomaly - then you can > be sure they will immediately try to buy or finance it, and then help to > promote it - NOT hide it. And that is doubly ture if they are funded by oil > interests. What better way for an oil company to succeed against the > comptetion ! > > That is the only logical purpose for their endeavor and they are very logical > and precise people. (well, the only purpose aside from being the first to > propose a theory behind the breakthrough: i.e. from the more noble i.e. > "Nobel" perspective). > > IOW IF the theoreticians at ET are in the cat-bird's seat, and are the first > to spot ZPE in action, then the payoff for them is more than monetary, since > it allows precious time to hone the "theory" in advance of the public demo. > Get it? > > That is most laudable, when you come to think of it. Personally, I salute > them and their efforts for being both thorough and tough and even a little > skeptical. You have to be, given the skills of the con-artists at work out > there in "free-energy". > > When and if a robust showing of a real energy anomaly occurs, you can be sure > that they will NOT try to hide it - but instead - they will probably try to > buy into it in some way (even if only from the theoretical perspective)! > > ... and please, no comments today about turkey investors being led to the > slaughter! > > Jones > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 6:02:31 AM > Subject: [Vo]:Free Energy Intentionally Put Off? > > This was recently (11/23/09) posted on the Hydrino group: > > "As I have pointed out in the past, EarthTech is not to > be trusted. Their purpose is to pretend to fail at > replication so as to discredit experiments that risk > upsetting the status quo: > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hydrino/message/12488 > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hydrino/message/12558 > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/hydrino/message/13036";; > > While I have often suspected the same, I find it remarkable that this > poster, who is possibly a lecturer at the University of Pittsburg (in > the Chevron Science Center no less! :) makes such bold statements. > > He goes on to say that Randell Mills is wise to shun EarthTech. > > Terry > >
