I think that it is clear to everyone that socialism, communism in anything
like the form that we have seen in the past is not what anyone is talking
about, not even the theory/ideals of Marxism would have any fans.

However something else that is differentiated from current so called
capitalism or communism or any other type of ism would be desirable.

No what I am talking about doesn't have a name but it is more social and so
does sound a bit like socialism.
And though I am talking about my own concept that I have developed I am sure
that others when they speak positively about socialism have something much
more like what I have in mind than anything resembling "socialism".

Rather I think that your remark is more of a troll as I believe you know
that full well.

The relative success of democrats/left/liberals as leaders of countries and
of developers of businesses as already mentioned is what is meant not
anything resembling communism.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Rick Monteverde <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is a troll, right?
>
> Glorious examples of Socialism's successes please?
>
> Thought so.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: grok [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 6:05 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Who is John Galt?
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> As the smoke cleared, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> mounted the
> barricade and roared out:
>
> > With regard to both energy and the economy those bumper stickers should
> ask:
> > "Where is John Galt when we need him?"
> >
> > Ayn Rand gave us John Galt in fiction. Reality hands us Bernie Madoff.
> > No one does more harm to capitalism than capitalists.
> >
> > - Jed
>
> I really hate to break this to people here, but the future has *always*
> been
> with Socialism -- and that includes our glorious energy future as well.
> And some people can rant against this all they want, invoking their rabid
> "individualist" ideology or whatever -- but that doesn't make what I've
> just
> said any the less necessary as what we must aim for.
>
> And we can seetoday, too, where "individualism"(sic) gets us, for that
> matter...
>
>
> - -- grok.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - --
> *** FULL-SPECTRUM DOMINANCE! ***************************************
> * BOYCOTT BOURGEOIS MASS-MEDIA:  *   McNews:  UNfair & UNbalanced  *
> *  Get mediaworx for your group/Internet/pirate tv/radio station!  *
> ****  Critical endorsement only  ****  Most sites need donations ***
> * http://satellite.indymedia.org North American Indymedia Newsreal *
> * http://newsreal.indymedia.de         European Indymedia Newsreal *
> * http://www.outfoxed.org    Outfoxed       ****        AFSC Video *
> * http://www.afsc.org/resources/video-film.htm     Lending Library *
> * http://www.unionist.com/song.htm          Labor Song of the Week *
> * http://www.mirafilms.org                              Mira Films *
> * http://www.canofun.com/videoclips.asp     Can o' Fun video clips *
> *********   HEY, KIDS!:  JUST SAY *NO* TO THE DRAFT!   *************
> GPG fingerprint = 2E7F 2D69 4B0B C8D5 07E3  09C3 5E8D C4B4 461B B771
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFJoCY1Xo3EtEYbt3ERAn0+AJ0WGYt2/SyTWJp1kspoHudqphtp9ACg1i/n
> EBAHg9MlDUiSeposPNiaQkk=
> =7KGL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

Reply via email to