Well I guess that would be off the scale, those who hold it as a political ideology would assume that there is a system to keep people from harming each other or that the society did not contain dysfunction so not requiring any army/police/justice system to protect people
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:58 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to John Berry's message of Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:13:40 +1300: > Hi, > [snip] > >I consider the N extreme to be the ideal, though one that people must be > >ready for, but I am looking at the north end as being labeled libertarian > >not anarchist which has different connotations. (Libertarian does not > bring > >up images of Sid Viscous and graffiti) > > > [snip] > The extreme example of free will is a lawless society where everyone is > free to > do exactly as they please. This is anarchy by definition, and the closest > example today that I can think of is Somalia. > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html > >
