Umm, my name isnt steven....
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:30 PM, thomas malloy <temall...@usfamily.net> wrote:
> Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
>> thomas malloy wrote:
>>
>>>> Finally, I believe global warming is thought to produce temperature
>>>> extremes including colder than normal temperatures in winter.
>>>
>>> That's why they call it Climate Change, it covers them either way.
>>
>> It only covers them if the climate is, in fact, changing. It has to change
>> in either direction, or in both directions in different seasons. If the
>> average for winter is no colder than it was 50 or 100 years ago, and summer
>> is no warmer, that means they are wrong. The test they face is just as
>> rigorous and easy to verify as it would be if the change is only in one
>> direction, so they are not "covered" in any sense.
>>
> That was brilliant Jed. I laughed more at it, than I did at Steven's silly
> poem.
>
>>
>>> According to Christopher Horner, the AGW advocates have doctored the data
>>> to support the warning hypothesis, you OTOH, contend that the warming effect
>>> is real . . .
>>
>> Naturally I am assuming that they did not doctor the data. If they did,
>> then the effect is not real.
>
> How open minded of you Jed. I may just have to procure a copy of Horner's
> book just to ascertain the veracity of his claims.
>
>>
>> However, as I said before, I think it is extremely unlikely that they
>> doctored the data and yet none of the conspirators has revealed that fact.
>
> But it has been revealed, Horner's book is but one,of several which make the
> aforementioned claim.
>
>> Tens of thousands of people would have to be in on the conspiracy and I
>> think it is impossible for so many people to keep a secret.
>
> If the Horner, et al, are correct, there are a few well placed people
> beating the drum, and a lot of other people cowered into silence.
>
>> From what I know of human nature I suppose the likelihood of this is zero
>> to 8 or 10 decimal places. I am surprised that you or anyone else takes this
>> hypothesis seriously.
>
> IMHO, the truth is right in front of you.
>
>>
>> If there were only a few dozen people involved in the conspiracy, then it
>> would be plausible that the data has been diddled with.
>
> Unless we're right of course, and it's a conspiracy of tens of thousands,
> done in plain sight.
>
> See my next post....
>
>
> --- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! --
> http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html ---
>
>
