Terry sez: > Speaking of, did you see the article on particle interaction entanglement? > > http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/090603-maco-entanglement.html > > It's a first. > > Terry
I just received another unexpected response from an unknown point of reference: ------------- All this talk about "entanglement" is highly amusing to me. Don't get me wrong. I bought the "entanglement" concept hook, line, and sinker as well, just like everyone else when I read about the odd phenomenon in the science books. But in my case, after a series of unexpected events which were not of my choosing, which ultimately culminated in me becoming unhinged in time as the only viable choice left to escape a nasty group of individuals who would prefer that I simply disappear, I had to confront the startling revelation that "time" and "space" are not at all what the 20th century science books claim. Please understand, I don't fault these 20th century inquisitive scientists and researchers. They did the best they could, using the crude observational tools they had at their disposal. But then, that was part of the problem - the observational tools, unbeknownst to these researchers were becoming "entangled" in the whole mess as well, essentially skewing the test results. Scientists thought their observations were detached and objective when in truth they were setting up conditions - what I would describe as "pocket-probability" realities that were as transient as the sub-atomic particles they were attempting to pin down. I could blather on, such as what in your time-frame, what is called "entanglement" would be more apt to be described as nothing more mundane than another pattern of unified consciousness manifesting some of its fundamental characteristics - but I am likely to get a lot of blank stares. No matter. It will all come out in the wash eventually. If there is one piece of useful insight that I hope I can convey concerning the "entanglement" mystery it would be: Stop trying to observe the phenomenon so intently with your rulers and yard sticks! Stop trying to whack them so hard, too! Stop trying to pick all those "particles" apart into their fundamental components. All you'll end up doing is produce a new batch of mysterious particles and characteristics just as paradoxical. What is, well... what you will eventually discover is that this so-called "entanglement" phenomenon is nothing more mysterious than a fundamental characteristic of unified consciousness randomly generating a new batch of camouflage environments for consciousness to enter into and play around in. I know that doesn't make much sense to many readers, but that's the best that I can do in "dis-entangleing" the mystery, particularly within the short period of time I have left at my disposal. I have to sever the connection now. The time-line police are very good at tapping into unregistered transmissions, especially if they are kept stable for more than a few minutes at a time - no pun intended. Until our next "entanglement"... "Vince" Dinglelint ----------------- Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
