Again I didn't conceal or lie by omission. I said from the start that there is more and there was.
My reasons for not giving it all at the start makes sense and was given. Also no "results" were "distorted" you must have misunderstood me. Rather a "means" for the electrons to do what was claimed was left out to simplify the job of communicating the idea as the whole thing is quite large and still not yet covered when we get to the aetheric part of it. Indeed what I first presented the idea I didn't even understand all these connections and it took a while. Giving further evidence that the electrons can gain the ability to leave a glass container and fly into the environment is not required to explain the idea unless someone objects that that should not be possible so I was waiting for that objection. I still have no indication that Bill B. read the post I made especially for him on account of him not having caught my first post on the subject. second post: Energy generating variable capacitor 0 replies Clearly it takes a lot of effort to write large emails and if no one is taking the time to read them as they are then investing more time will probably only reduce the odds of anyone reply, why? The more people are aware they don't know enough to reply the less likely they will be to step in. So since "you asked for it" (MJ & WB) I hope that you will read and reply. I understand not having the time to read lengthy emails and that was my reason for keeping things concise. Implying that my motivation was a form of dishonesty is both confusing to me (I held back evidence that supports my case) and to me somewhat hostile. Hopefully this is simply misunderstanding on both sides. 2009/6/24 Mark Iverson <[email protected]> > Bill wrote: > > "I suggest that it's a VERY bad idea to try distorting results by > concealing any parts of it. > Concealment is an element of deception, that's why the legal phrase says > "the WHOLE truth." Such > concealment is what manipulative people do. You'd best avoid it." > > Bill, you're much to Diplomatic... > > I prefer the more descriptive, albeit blunt, statement, "Lying by > Omission"! > :-) > > Politicians have this down pat... > If you don't ask them all the right questions, you'll never get the WHOLE > truth. > > -Mark > >
