Horace,
I do realize that the force is inconsequential but please
consider two things, first it results in equivalence which is a constant
acceleration and just like an ion drive can eventually produce huge
velocities, second the hydrogen's spatial motion relative to an observer
outside the cavity is almost stationary suggesting that practically all
accumulated velocity is on the time axis.
My concept is that Bourgoins variables XYZt are correctly
solving for fractional quantum states but "t" inside the cavity is
experiencing equivalence and slowly accelerating away from the 1 second per
second rate an observer outside the cavity experiences. The fractional
states are more than just a 3D illusion; the hydrogen atom is traveling away
from us on the time axis. I am trying to say put Lorentz contraction in
terms of volume and absolute dt of the cavity inside vs outside as it will
contract in either direction.
Best Regards
Fran
_____
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 5:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hydrino represents Lorentz contraction in the opposite
direction from event horizon
On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Frank wrote:
Horace,
I agree and can't believe they didn't pursue it further.
This demonstrates the problem with attempting to doing physics without any
kind of quantitative concepts. If you limit yourself to non-quantitative
concepts then you have no feel for what you are talking about. Do you have
any idea how inconsequential a force of 10^-17 N between plates is?
They basically built a tiny time machine -
They didn't build anything. They made some quantitative predictions. I
assume you are still talking about Di Fiore et al.
a very local little source of equivalent acceleration with an abrupt
boundary and didn't consider what would happen if a reactant such as a gas
atom were diffused through it.
The force they propose is so little as to be almost immeasurable and utterly
inconsequential to the existence of hydrinos.
Equivalence is accumulative in the Twin paradox and should be here also. It
could explain the fractional quantum states as relativistic
If hydrinos exist, which is still uncertain, they involve relativistic
orbitals, *not* the kind of translational relativistic effects you imply.
The internal orbitals of ordinary atoms are relativistic, and they are not
in Casimir cavities. Would you speak in the same terms about them? I think
you should direct questions on this to Stephan A. Lawrence. He seems to be
much more capable to handle them.
-Lorentz contraction while from the hydrogen's perspective nothing has
changed..
What Lorentz contraction?
Everybody is right? The Bohr radius is both fractional state and not
fractional state depending on your perspective.
No. The existence or not of hydrinos has nothing to do with perspective.
Further, their existence or not does not depend on being in Casimir
cavities.
Best Regards
Fran
_____
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 8:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hydrino represents Lorentz contraction in the opposite
direction from event horizon
On Aug 18, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
Horace,
I added the following paragraph to my theory after discovering a paper
describing a Casimir cavity created equivalence.
An interesting concept, but, as they imply, a force on such a small order
requires heroic efforts just to detect. This is not a force that can have
anything to do with energy levels on the order of ionization potentials, or
even have any commonly detectable influence on the Casimir force itself, or
on the spectrum of any radiation from the cavity.
The theory that Casimir cavities represent an abrupt equivalence boundary is
not new, In 2002 a paper "Vacuum fluctuation force on a
<http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0109091> rigid Casimir cavity in a
gravitational field" by Italian researchers Enrico Calloni, Luciano Di
Fiore, Giampiero Esposito, Leopoldo Milano, Luigi Rosa discusses the
possibility of verifying the equivalence principle for the zero-point energy
of quantum electrodynamics, by evaluating the force, produced by vacuum
fluctuations, acting on a rigid Casimir cavity in a weak gravitational
field. The resulting force has opposite direction with respect to the
gravitational acceleration, Their proposal indicates equivalent acceleration
outside the cavity relative to inside the cavity. This differential between
inside and outside the cavity creates the relativistic perception of
frequency up conversion. From the perspective of the Beck - Mackey work, the
ratio of fast to slow virtual photons appears to increase and has fewer
gravitationally active virtual photons. One could also simply consider this
duty factor -if time inside the cavity executes at multiple seconds per
second from our perspective then the earths gravity at 9.8m/s^2 is divided
down by the same factor.
Regards
Fran
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
