Had looked unsuccesssfully for "Turing" in this thread but hadn't read that other thread, as Harbach Jak doesn't pass the Turing test with me ;)
Michel 2009/8/19 Horace Heffner <[email protected]>: > > On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:30 AM, Michel Jullian wrote: > >> Haven't had time to read all this interesting thread, > > Yes. You are apparently 8 days behind. > >> just a couple >> things I noticed: >> >> Frank: how can you keep talking about the Lorentz contraction if the >> Lorentz transform doesn't make sense to you? >> >> Stephen: your expression of the Lorentz transform misses the dot >> product and the (vertical) t x y z vector doesn't it? >> >> Horace: it's Turing not Touring >> >> Michel > > > On Aug 11, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Horace Heffner wrote: >> >> On Aug 11, 2009, at 2:44 AM, Harbach Jak wrote: >>> >>> >>> None-the-less I give great weight and credence to your rather excellent >>> articulation of the matter. >> >> Thanks. I might have more credibility if I could spell Turing. >> > > Best regards, > > Horace Heffner > http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ > > > > >
