On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:30 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Haven't had time to read all this interesting thread,
Yes. You are apparently 8 days behind.
just a couple
things I noticed:
Frank: how can you keep talking about the Lorentz contraction if the
Lorentz transform doesn't make sense to you?
Stephen: your expression of the Lorentz transform misses the dot
product and the (vertical) t x y z vector doesn't it?
Horace: it's Turing not Touring
Michel
On Aug 11, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Aug 11, 2009, at 2:44 AM, Harbach Jak wrote:
None-the-less I give great weight and credence to your rather
excellent articulation of the matter.
Thanks. I might have more credibility if I could spell Turing.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
