On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Frank wrote:
Horace,
I agree and can’t believe they didn’t pursue it further.
This demonstrates the problem with attempting to doing physics
without any kind of quantitative concepts. If you limit yourself to
non-quantitative concepts then you have no feel for what you are
talking about. Do you have any idea how inconsequential a force of
10^-17 N between plates is?
They basically built a tiny time machine –
They didn't build anything. They made some quantitative predictions.
I assume you are still talking about Di Fiore et al.
a very local little source of equivalent acceleration with an
abrupt boundary and didn’t consider what would happen if a reactant
such as a gas atom were diffused through it.
The force they propose is so little as to be almost immeasurable and
utterly inconsequential to the existence of hydrinos.
Equivalence is accumulative in the Twin paradox and should be here
also. It could explain the fractional quantum states as relativistic
If hydrinos exist, which is still uncertain, they involve
relativistic orbitals, *not* the kind of translational relativistic
effects you imply. The internal orbitals of ordinary atoms are
relativistic, and they are not in Casimir cavities. Would you speak
in the same terms about them? I think you should direct questions on
this to Stephan A. Lawrence. He seems to be much more capable to
handle them.
–Lorentz contraction while from the hydrogen’s perspective nothing
has changed….
What Lorentz contraction?
Everybody is right? The Bohr radius is both fractional state and
not fractional state depending on your perspective.
No. The existence or not of hydrinos has nothing to do with
perspective. Further, their existence or not does not depend on
being in Casimir cavities.
Best Regards
Fran
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 8:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hydrino represents Lorentz contraction in the
opposite direction from event horizon
On Aug 18, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
Horace,
I added the following paragraph to my theory after discovering a
paper describing a Casimir cavity created equivalence.
An interesting concept, but, as they imply, a force on such a small
order requires heroic efforts just to detect. This is not a force
that can have anything to do with energy levels on the order of
ionization potentials, or even have any commonly detectable
influence on the Casimir force itself, or on the spectrum of any
radiation from the cavity.
The theory that Casimir cavities represent an abrupt equivalence
boundary is not new, In 2002 a paper "Vacuum fluctuation force on a
rigid Casimir cavity in a gravitational field" by Italian
researchers Enrico Calloni, Luciano Di Fiore, Giampiero Esposito,
Leopoldo Milano, Luigi Rosa discusses the possibility of verifying
the equivalence principle for the zero-point energy of quantum
electrodynamics, by evaluating the force, produced by vacuum
fluctuations, acting on a rigid Casimir cavity in a weak
gravitational field. The resulting force has opposite direction
with respect to the gravitational acceleration, Their proposal
indicates equivalent acceleration outside the cavity relative to
inside the cavity. This differential between inside and outside the
cavity creates the relativistic perception of frequency up
conversion. From the perspective of the Beck - Mackey work, the
ratio of fast to slow virtual photons appears to increase and has
fewer gravitationally active virtual photons. One could also simply
consider this duty factor -if time inside the cavity executes at
multiple seconds per second from our perspective then the earths
gravity at 9.8m/s^2 is divided down by the same factor.
Regards
Fran
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
