Dr. Swartz: You should read carefully Stephen Lawrence's post today, 9/30/2009, at 6:16PM. You might want to recind your comment since Stephen included quotes from as far back as 5 Dec 2004 which CLEARLY show that Jed has ALWAYS admitted that he got the CD from you, but that he couldn't read it. Thus, your comment about his "lying about getting the CD", and "finally admitting he got it" are obviously an exaggeration at the very least, if not a conscious attempt to deceive. All I want to know now is when are you going to post a reply to Vortex that specifically gives Jed permission to download and post your papers on lenr-canr's website???? Shouldn't take you more than 2 or 3 minutes to compose that and post it here... I'll be looking for it in the morning! Cheers,
-Mark _____ From: Dr. Mitchell Swartz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 7:37 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Swartz is running a extortion racket At 09:26 PM 9/30/2009, Rothwell, proven disingenuous, wrote: Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Update: Dr. Swartz has posted the URL of one of his papers on Vortex, as of about an hour ago. I don't know if it's one of the papers Jed was considering uploading or not." Rothwell: "I have not considered uploading any paper by Swartz for the last 10 years. " There are three issues here: First, the truth continues to slowly leak out of disingenuous Jed, little by little, as his stories change. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rothwell: "Not since he first threatened me." Second, what utter nonsense. This totally new fabrication and story du jour by Rothwell is laughable. Rothwell was asked for the proof of his libelous allegation of 'extortion'. He has been silent except to attempt to change the subject over and over. Therefore, Rothwell is not a man of honor. He is shown to have been dishonest, and has failed to apologize. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Third, flashback: NOTA BENE: Rothwell's latest decompensation and picking of a fight followed a simple question: Rothwell had posted: {referring to the docs given to the DOE panel] Rothwell: "The documents they were given are listed here: http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/DoeReview.htm#Submissions - Jed" I thanked Jed, pointed out that I had not seen the table, and that one observation was that when the papers which were distributed to the DOE in 2004 (as they assembled to consider CF/LANR) were examined, the table indicates that all of the papers of Prof. Dash and I, although possibly referenced, were apparently absent from the printed papers handed out to the DOE --- even though ***ironically*** Dr.Dash and I were (and remain, I think) the only ones who have actually conducted open cold fusion demonstrations in the USA at a national meeting. Methinks Rothwell protests too much -- for reasons unclear. No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.115/2404 - Release Date: 09/30/09 05:52:00
