Dr. Swartz:
You should read carefully Stephen Lawrence's post today, 9/30/2009, at 6:16PM.
You might want to recind your comment since Stephen included quotes from as far back as 5 Dec 2004 which CLEARLY show that Jed has ALWAYS admitted that he got the CD from you, but that he couldn't read it. Thus, your comment about his "lying about getting the CD", and "finally admitting he got it" are obviously an exaggeration at the very least, if not a conscious attempt to deceive.
All I want to know now is when are you going to post a reply to Vortex that specifically gives Jed permission to download and post your papers on lenr-canr's website???? Shouldn't take you more than 2 or 3 minutes to compose that and post it here... I'll be looking for it in the morning!
Cheers,
-Mark
Mark,
Jed and others on vortex have had permission for quite a long time.
I have posted my papers repeatedly to vortex, and CMNS, and anyone
who has requested them. Many times.
The lies of Rothwell that they have been withheld for any of
Rothwell's fabricated convoluted reasons is brazen, and obviously
laughable. We do not want the work edited by Jed.
For those interested, I have been working with Dr. Brian Josephson
many months, as an experiment, sending the papers by
email to Jed and Brian.
The fact is: Brian and the others received them.
Brian encouraged Jed to put them up on his site, but Jed insisted
e edit them. Thereafter, Jed always found a "problem".
We don't believe the contrived CD rants by Jed, because
there were more than one set of CD. One was given in hand
and the other was mailed. I still have the postal receipt
included from paper copies sent.
Thereafter, multiple pdf copies were sent.
One doubts that all of the copies were all 'bad',
given that every other recipient had no problem with
CDs, with the paper receipts, with emails, with second
pdfs ... etc. etc.
Permission was not only given, but several times, including
implicitly by the very effort made to send the documents.
Have good day.
Mitchell Swartz
