On Sep 30, 2009, at 5:23 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Really, did Storms (2007) actually have to mention spontaneous human combustion? It was speculation upon speculation. (p. 142.) He does have much more reason to discuss Mills, and he does it in quite some depth. For some unknown reason, the more extensive discussion (p. 184-186) is missing from the index; he actually gives much more ink to Mills than to any other proposed explanations.
I think spontaneous human combustion (SHC) is worthy of consideration in relation to cold fusion because (a) there is solid evidence it exists and (b) it may provide clues as to how to achieve a robust free or nuclear energy process in a chemical environment. This has been discussed in this forum in past years. A summary of my comments here is provided at:
http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/SHC.pdf Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
