In reply to  Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:07:37 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>On Oct 21, 2009, at 12:54 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> In reply to  Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:37:42  
>> -0800:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This appears to be the same technology used in CRT TV sets. I  
>> wonder what the
>> energy of the electrons is, and whether or not x-rays are produced?
>
>
>I didn't see any information regarding that. It must be a pretty low  
>voltage because otherwise the efficiency would be much lower.   The  
>bulbs are supposedly comparable to CFLs in efficiency.   Due to the  
>quantum nature of light, I think any excess energy above that  
>required to step up the electrons to the energy levels needed would  
>be wasted, and that should be well under 20 eV.  

I considered that, however there is also the possibility that only some of the
energy of a fast electron is lost in each collision, allowing a single fast
electron to excite multiple atoms. That would still allow reasonable efficiency,
even for fast electrons, so I don't think the efficiency argument can be used to
decide about the voltage. IOW I'm still curious.

>Better to put the  
>power toward a higher current than any voltage much above the  
>threshold I think.  The advantage over ordinary CRTs is that the  
>fluorescent time can be much longer - no need for fast phosphors,  
>fast travel times, or narrow focused beams.  In fact, a low voltage  
>would assist in getting a wide dispersion of the beam due to more  
>time for mutual Coulomb repulsion of electrons in the beam to occur.

Good points.

>
>I'm very curious as to whether any rare commodities are used in the  
>bulbs, what is used for an emitter and for phsphors, and thus the  
>exposure to the Chinese commodities grab.  A filament emitter would  
>be somewhat of an energy hog and reduce bulb life.  The bulb life is  
>supposedly comperable to CFLs as well.  I don't understand why LED  
>supposedly lights take so much power, unless it is for energy  
>conversion circuitry.  I think some of the big new Wal-Mart store LED  
>lighting installations use a centralized DC power supply, and DC  
>network, driven by both AC and by photovoltaics, so that may cut down  
>on energy lost to heat by their LED bulb replacements. I accidentally  
>left a two AA battery LED flashlight on and was amazed to see it  
>running just fine about 20 hours later. It did not produce noticeable  
>heat.

Perhaps LED efficiency depends on the colour?

Regards,

Robin van Spaandonk

http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html

Reply via email to