Please indicate when you are quoting and when you are writing original material. The style you have been using indicates that /all/ that you post is original material, which is false.
On 01/22/2011 09:09 AM, noone noone wrote: > Dear Mr Brian Robertson: > I again want to return on your comment, because it is very important, > and I forgot to say a thing that I deem important too. > The same Professors of the University of Bologna who made the test of > the 14th of January, had made a preliminar test, closed doors, on the > 17th of December 2010. > During that preliminar test, made to check the idoneity of their > instrumentation, being closed doors we could make a mode of operation > that, for safety issues, I cannot make in public, it is they made the > reactor go also without the drive of the electric resistance. This > preliminar test will also be described in the report that will be > published on monday. In that case, we had a production of energy, with > no energy at all at the input. The same thing happened in tests we > made for our Customers, in the USA and in Europe. > You know what happens if you put any number upside a line of fraction > and zero below the same line. > This is why this mode is dangerous: before use it we need to know > perfectly the theory. Where I need real help is the formulation of a > solid theory; books can help, but up to a certain point, here is a new > chapter to write. Less than all help comments of imbeciles (from Latin > "imbacula", not an offense at all) who just say "it is impossible" , > turn around, and go. > Warm regards, > A.R. > Useless to say that if you make just warmed water instead of steam the > output energy calculated is the same. > Warm Regards, > A.R. >
