Fusing Fear and Science - Lets stick to Nickel and Hydrogen 

Humans fear the unknown. If they do not understand something their first 
reaction is usually to run from it or attack it. Certain parties that 
understand 
this can use that fear to their advantage. There are examples of this 
throughout 
history and even more so in modern times. By manipulating fear political 
parties, corporate entities, big businesses, military complexes, and nations 
can 
herd the masses. Fear can be used to start wars, entice hatred, manipulate 
economies, and make normally intelligent and rational people do irrational 
things. 


Unfortunantly, scientific advancement has not been free of the fear factor. As 
we speak a new "Cold Fusion" technology is launching. How will the world react 
when they realize it is real and not a hoax? Will they accept this amazing new 
technology and quickly utilize it to benefit all of humanity? Or will powerful 
entities fuse fear and science to slow down and limit the utilization of this 
technology? Lets take a look at an issue we are facing today in which fear is 
used to push agendas and manipulate the masses.

For thousands of years humans have been using plants and other substances for 
medical purposes. Sometimes it is to treat a disease, other times to relieve 
pain, and other times for recreation. The use of these substances always have 
risks involved. Some drugs can have severe side effects, others can be habit 
forming, others can kill in improper doses, and others can impair judgement. 
These risks have led governments around the world to start a "War on Drugs" 
which prohibits the production, cultivation, posession, and usage of many 
natural and synthetic medical substances. 


This "War on Drugs" has been a disaster. Despite severe penalties for breaking 
drug laws they are violated frequently. Most school children can obtain just 
about any drug they want. Our prisons are filled with individuals who were 
convicted of a drug related crimes, but for every one that is caught many more 
elude the authorities. It can be debated if drug laws should exist or if 
certain 
drugs should be legalized. However, no one can deny fear has been used by law 
enforcement, special interest groups, governments, and schools to propagate 
specific propaganda and beliefs. 


One drug that has been victimized by fear is marijuana. Of all the illegal 
drugs 
in the USA it is probably the safest. Some studies indicate that it is safer 
than alcohol or tobacco. Yet it is illegal in most of the USA. However, certain 
groups have lied repeatedly to keep it outlawed. It all begins during the 
"reefer madness" era when logging companies were threatened by "industrial 
hemp" 
which is a form of marijuana with almost no potential for drug abuse. 
Specifically, it is low in THC which is one of the main natural chemicals in 
marijuana that produce euphoric effects. The logging industry was threatened by 
the fact that industrial hemp could be used to produce fiber, rope, paper, 
clothing, and food. So they began to encourage newspapers to write up false 
stories depicting individuals using marijuana and comitting violent crimes. 
This 
scared countless people. Before long marijuana nd industrial hemp were both 
illegal.

In more modern times governments and groups have continued to lie about 
marijuana. For example, the 1980's commercials on TV claimed marijuana fried 
brain cells. However, we now know THC is a neural antioxidant. Also, there are 
studies which show THC has cancer fighting properties. The government also 
tries 
to tell us there is no medical use for marijuana when modern science has proven 
it can help relieve pain, prevent nausea, reduce stress, reduce pressure in the 
eye in glaucoma sufferers, etc. 


Another example of propaganda about marijuana is the idea that if made legal it 
would fill the road with dangerous drivers. However, studies indicate that 
people who drive intoxicated from marijuana have less chance of getting into an 
accident than people who drive after using alcohol.

Perhaps another interesting fact is that it is almost impossible to overdose 
and 
die from using marijuana. Large quantities of marijuana can be consumed without 
significant toxicity. However, it is very easy to overdose on alcohol or 
caffeine which are both totally legal.

How does this relate to cold fusion? There could be people who try to claim 
cold 
fusion is dangerous for various reasons and should be closely regulated. Yes, 
there will be dangers using a cold fusion device. However, there are dangers 
using almost any device. A turkey fryer can catch your home on fire if you do 
not watch it. A small heater can tip over and catch your home on fire. A saw 
from home depot can cut your finger off if you are not careful. An internal 
combusion engine that is not maintained can catch fire. The list goes on and on!

There is no reason a cold fusion device should have any more regulations than 
other similar LEGAL devices that are also dangerous. Do you have to have a 
license from the NRC to buy a generator from Home Depot? If you run that 
generator inside of your home you can gas yourself to death! This happens every 
year! It is possible a cold fusion device could emit some low level of 
radiation. In my opinion if you disobey safety guidelines by sleeping next to 
it 
to stay warm then it is your fault if you get radiation burns or cancer! 


With any product PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY is the key. Anyone that buys a product 
has the responsibility to follow the instructions that come with it. If they do 
not follow the instructions and something happens it is their own fault. Also, 
if they use a product recklessly and harm someone else they can be found 
criminally responsible! 


However, there will be fear mongers that will yell and scream about the safety 
dangers of cold fusion reactors. They will say allowing private citizens to own 
them is "irresponsible." In addition, they may claim having one in a vehicle is 
insane. Instead of EDUCATING people about the risks involved and trying to make 
these devices SAFER they might simply advocate a ban on these devices outside 
of 
power plants. 


What is scary is that they may go further. The loggers who got marijuana banned 
did not stop there. They got industrial hemp banned too. It is possible that 
lawmakers, corporations, or advocacy groups could demand no use of cold fusion 
until hundreds of millions of dollars worth of testing is performed. This could 
take many years. During this time we will have used up more oil reserves, 
polluted the planet even more, and our economy will have crumbled. In this time 
period we could be phasing out oil usage for energy, the internal combustion 
engine, and using the monetary savings to benefit our species.

Instead of banning cold fusion like marijuana and industrial hemp it should be 
utilized! For example, industrial hemp was a huge industry in the USA until it 
was banned. Cold Fusion could be such an industry! It could be enough to boost 
our economy! Just imagine the ripple effects as thousands of factories are 
opened or re-tooled to build Cold Fusion generators. This would create 
countless 
jobs!

I consider cold fusion to be a very safe technology. It poses some risks, but 
the fact of the matter is they will probably be minimal like those associated 
with marijuana. For example, if you have a cold fusion reactor if they tell you 
to keep it shielded do so! Also, if they tell you not to open it up and work on 
it yourself do not! If they tell you not to override the fail-safe that 
prevents 
it from overheating do not! 


My guess is there will be a few incidents with cold fusion reactors, but they 
will actually be far fewer than those with internal combustion engines. Due to 
the very nature of the devices they will have to be built with EXTRA 
safeguards. 
I doubt most models available to civilians will work at 1/10th of their 
potential to prevent the possibility of an overload. But what would happen if a 
"melt down" did happen? With a cold fusion cell probably not much more than 
would happen if a generator or car engine blew up. There would probably 
relatively little radioactivity and once the explosion occurs the reaction 
would 
end. I doubt most cells would even "blow up." My guess is that they will have 
some sort of pressure relief valve which will activate to vent fuel if the cell 
becomes too hot. Also, they could have a small canister of nitrogen or some 
other substance that would open up and end the reaction if the cell becomes too 
hot. The worst that that would happen 99.9% of the time is that your generator 
would be non functional and if you bought a warranty you would get a new one.

Unfortunantly, if fear is used most people will not consider the facts. They 
will listen to what government agencies, advocacy groups, politicians, and 
others have to say. Even if Cold Fusion could benefit them they will jump up 
and 
start protesting against it.

My hope is that lots of people will stand up and say NO to the fear factor. If 
enough of us DEMAND that Cold Fusion technology be utilized the powers that be 
will have to listen to us. 


      

Reply via email to