I don't think he has been dishonest with us at all.

He has told us for a long time that the copper comes from Ni 62 and Ni 64. He 
just did not state that they enriched the nickel.

To me, the situation is obvious.

He buys one quantity of nickel powder. He stated that the nickel powder he buys 
costs about 20 dollars a kilogram.

He has found some process of removing some of the other isotopes so that there 
is a higher percentage of Ni62 and Ni64. This process costs about two dollars. 
This is probably due to the chemicals used. 


He then adds the catalysts.

However, because the Nickel was enriched there is probably less than one 
kilogram of nickel remaining. 


There was no dishonesty in any of this.





________________________________
From: Jones Beene <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 5:54:27 PM
Subject: RE: Fwd: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat CATALYST Speculation Thread

 
From:noone noone 
 
Dear Mr Mattias Carlsson:

Yes, we do.
Warm Regards,
A.R.

ROSSI ENRICHES HIS NICKEL!

Now, does this tell us anything about the type of catalyst he uses? 
 
 
No – but it tells us volumes about someone’s basic honesty, doesn’t it ?
At least when you place this information side-by-side with the “adds 10% to the 
cost of nickel” quote. 

Why?
The cost of the cheapest nickel isotope is on the order of ~$20,000/gram. 
Cough … cough … Does anyone really believe they are getting straight answers 
about anything important from this inventor ? He may be honest about trivial 
details but that is all you can depend on.
I’m sorry I wasted my time with a previous post - trying to rationalize out how 
Rossi could be honest about the stainless, or the clear lack thereof, when the 
Swedish analysis showed no chromium. … and I am looking at a recent isotope 
analysis of a sample from a US inventor, which was in a stainless Dewar for two 
days and it SHOWS chromium !!
Why waste time with this nonsense? You will get no honest answers from him.
If you are going to replicate – the LAST THING you want to do is base any 
design 
choice on a pronouncement from Rossi about any detail which can related to 
important issues, like the catalyst or the quantities of reactants use. 

HE DOES NOT WANT REPLICATION - how obvious that is by now.
Jones

Reply via email to