On 11-06-19 12:04 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
1. I do not see them "admitting" any such thing.
2. It cannot be "obvious" to you because you were not there and
you have not used instruments or done tests to measure the
enthalpy of the steam.
It was obvious from the output temperature curves and description
of the experiment.
It cannot be that obvious, since the physicists at U. Bologna
disagree. Those people may be wrong but they are not amateurs or fools.
An independent expert analysis of these temperatures was recently
published showing that the steam was most dry, based on the
temperatures alone. I don't recall where that analysis is . . . Maybe
22passi?
I won't argue this with you again, Jed, I had enough trouble
getting you to admit that it's possible to have steam at higher
than 100 C at 1 atmosphere of pressure.
Oh come now. Don't make false accusations. I admitted fully and
frankly that I made a mistake there.
It's not a false accusation. Getting that admission was like pulling
teeth, and even then it was a qualified admission.
Don't make me search the archives to prove it.
