Joshua Cude wrote:
I didn't _not_ believe either. I wasn't sure.
You seemed pretty sure when you said: "As far as I can tell, they
disproved the Focardi claims." and many similar things.
You say I was "pretty sure" when I said "as far as I can tell"? How many
reservations, qualifications, maybes, not sure, could-be-wrongs do you
want from me? Just because you are certain of everything you say, please
do not imagine that I am. Take my word for it: when I say I don't know,
I don't know.
As for the discussion of LENR evidence in general, we've been over
that ground several times. I don't have any new arguments, and I
notice that you don't either.
I don't need any. You have never found a single error any any major
study, by someone like McKubre. No skeptic ever has. You have not
published a single paper! You have NOTHING. I have uploaded hundreds of
papers proving that I am right.
You waste your time chattering on about wet or dry steam, when it does
not make a dime's worth of difference. Any steam proves that Rossi is
right. Heck, his reactor has run with no input! It is ridiculous to
question these results.You blather on about this because Rossi has not
published hard data and real scientific papers. He's an engineer and
entrepreneur; such people never publish hard data. He says he does not
want to publish! That makes him vulnerable to nitpicking and to people
who look at one experiment at a time, ignoring the others. You are
playing semantic games, squinting and pretending that a photo of the
Loch Ness monster resembles a gigabytes of ultra-high precision
calorimetry data from an instrument that cost $250,000. That's an absurd
comparison.
If you were serious, instead of looking at the weakest, most
questionable data, from Rossi you would look at the best this field has
to offer. You would find an error in McKubre or Miles. You would write a
paper and submit it to peer-review in a journal. That's what scientists
do -- they don't play games, they do real work.
Let's see you find one substantive error in this paper:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/McKubreMCHisothermala.pdf
Not blather. Don't tell us this looks like a UFO sighting. Tell us
_exactly why_ these results are in error. If you know so damn much,
prove it. And write a proper paper, not a bunch of disconnected stream
of consciousness remarks. Also, by the way, publish your full name,
telephone number, and physical address. If you dare!
Otherwise, shut up.
- Jed
