On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> ** > I have uploaded hundreds of papers proving that I am right. > And yet, few believe. > Any steam proves that Rossi is right. > No. It doesn't. See earlier post. > Heck, his reactor has run with no input! > So he says. > It is ridiculous to question these results. > It is ridiculous not to. > You blather on about this because Rossi has not published hard data and > real scientific papers. > No. Because he has not presented evidence for excess heat. In any form. > If you were serious, [...] You would write a paper and submit it to > peer-review in a journal. > That may be true. I'm not that serious. > > Let's see you find one substantive error in this paper: > Why? The world already doesn't believe it. I don't believe it. And finding other people's mistakes is a mug's game. I don't believe perpetual motion claims either, but I'm not about to find errors in every claim. I'll wait for the evidence to "stand out" as you put it. For the demonstration you and Mallove were dreaming about. For the isolated Rothwell beaker than stays palpably warmer than the surroundings. If the claims are right, this should be easy. Until then, I will remain skeptical. And now look. You've managed to suck me in to another infinite loop. The arguments on both sides in this post have been made almost verbatim at least a half dozen times already.
