At 10:50 PM 7/19/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
I wouldn't call it an overflow issue, but a lot of people were wise to only a small fraction of the water being vaporized a long time ago.
I certainly didn't invent that idea. You could be correct with your idea that there would be a lot of "froth." What I saw being ignored was direct water flow, that some level of this would be expected. The overall question is "How much of the water is actually vaporized?" And there isn't an answer. No steps were taken to demonstrate this critical aspect of the demonstrations.
The demonstrations were such as to create an appearance of very substantial heat. The reality is ...
