Look, guys. If no one is pursuing the "really wet steam" theory anymore the steam wetness issue is pretty much moot. Sorry if I didn't realize that.
Originally, you may recall, numbers caste about were as high as 97% liquid by mass. This is dense enough a chunk of oak would float in it. Even 10% mass exceeds our usual experiences of steam wetness in my estimate. I was interested in buoyancy, not entrainment in a moving fluid. Steam wetness is still an interesting question, in and off itself, but not that interesting here, unless there is anyone still arguing it. It seems it would take a huge amount of energy to randomly break surface tension so often to generate buoyant droplets, such that the argument would defeat itself. The densest suspensions one might likely find are at the base of a Niagara Falls and I don't think this would float a cork.
