Jouni Valkonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> When Galantini observed the test, they had large version of E-Cat that > can store large quantities, perhaps several liters of water, before it > starts overflowing. When I am cooking, I can stop a pot from boiling dry whether it is large or small. It is not difficult at all. > This also means that ictu oculi is very unreliable > way to make reliable confirmation. He withdrew the probe and looked at it. It was dry. It would wet if there was water flowing through the machine. This is very reliable; anyone can see if an object is wet or dry. [speculation] My interpretation for the June E-Cat is that Rossi did > not show Krivit a working E-Cat, but only version where was only > electric heater active(!). I do not think there is any way he could have fooled Levi et al. with a fake machine. They worked with it for a month. Assuming the machine works, why would he bother to construct a fake machine? What would be the point? What would be Rossi's motive? Either all of the demonstrations are fake, or they are likely all real. Not only is there no conceivable advantage to showing a fake one, it could easily cause problems. Krivit or some other observer might detect a fake machine, after all. - Jed
