Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
The instruments prove that radium and the Rossi reactor produce
stable, unvarying heat. That much we know.
No, we don't know that at all. Jed, sometimes I can't figure out where
you get this nonsense. We sort-of-know that the temperature in the
reactor chimney is sort-of-constant, once the thing reaches operating
condition. We do not know, at all, that the heat is "stable,
unvarying." Indeed, we have some (inconclusive) evidence that it is
not. It's practically a consensus now, haven't you noticed? The
E-Cat/test design heat output could vary wildly and yet the chimney
temperature would remain stable, over a very wide range of heat
generation values. All that would vary is the steam quality.
(Here, "steam quality" refers to the ratio of vapor to total water in
the effluent, whether the "water" is as dispersed droplets or more
amalgamated liquid.)
I was discussing the flowing water test, not the steam tests. The
flowing water test produced a stable temperature over 18 hours.
Defkalion says their tests with high-boiling point liquids also produce
stable, steady-state temperatures. My point is that if a temperature is
stable, say 5°C over 18 hours, that is the most information you can get.
Listing that same temperature thousands of times will not increase your
knowledge.
- Jed
