No one has raised a valid objections to the flowing water test as far as I know. Your objection seem to be that you want to see the number "5°C" repeated a thousand times. Go ahead and use a word processor to repeat it yourself:.....
5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C
5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C
If I saw THAT I'd yell FAKE.
5.01°C 4.98°C 4.98°C 5.00°C ...
I once missed a physics lab, and cooked the numbers. I was WAY off the actual result (they changed the compostion slightly each year) -- but my fake showed such a good understanding of the likely error distribution that they gave me a pass.
| Abd ul-Rahman Lomax said
| .. and given the ubiquity of cheap logging devices ..
Ah .. the cheap logging devices for which they lost the results? (Jan).
