Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
You are perfectly aware that Rossi chose to use a method of measuring heat that was utterly inconclusive.
You meant the steam method. I am aware that some people think it is inconclusive. As far as I know, experts in calorimetry and steam think it is conclusive. But the whole point is that when Rossi and Levi learned that people think it is inclusive, _they did another test with flowing water_. They said the purpose was to put to rest doubts about the steam tests. That test produced a stable temperature. They watched the temperature display and so no major fluctuations, so the heat must have been stable. Defkalion reports the same thing.
No one has raised a valid objections to the flowing water test as far as I know. Your objection seem to be that you want to see the number "5°C" repeated a thousand times. Go ahead and use a word processor to repeat it yourself:
5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C 5°C
- Jed
