Am 19.09.2011 20:21, schrieb Robert Leguillon:
My Two Cents--
I must confess that I'm unfamiliar with the effect of electromagnetism
on conductive heating. I thought that I'd throw out a few questions
regarding the observations of the 4th paper, hoping to learn:
You must first kow, it is always possible to make a complicated system
out of nonlinear effects, introduce a lot of crossspeak and backcoupling
effects that the system is impossible to calculate and almost impossible
to measure precisely.
Then you can claim overunity effects and nobody is able to disprove it.
Thats not the way of science. The way of science is to isolate a
singular effect that is measurable, repeatable and possibly can be
calculated.
Most known natural laws are derived from the principle of energy
conservation. Quite often this is the only way to proof them.
All known natural laws are mathemathically compatible with energy
conservation.
Therefore it is impossibly to find overunity effects mathematically.
The only way to find overunity is to find a new energy source such as
LENR or ZPE and this is something that Steorn has not done yet.
If a customer tries to verificate their technology without theory and
without energy source, they should not demand license fees, they should
pay the customer for doing what he does.
Best,
Peter
