Regarding Mr. Krivit's Oct. 10 installment: It's a good example of what I mean when I have described Mr. Krivit as being a cynic at heart. Being a cynic is neither good, nor bad. It is how one uses their innate sense of "cynicism" in order to get to the bottom of a tantalizing mystery that determines whether the trait is a benefit... or a hindrance to their work.
I sure appreciate Mr. Krivit being a bit more forthcoming in his own thought processes on the controversial Rossi Saga. It helps me understand why this investigative reporter remains so suspicious of Rossi's claims. I would agree with Krivit in the sense that Rossi has obfuscated the details, particularly crucial evidence that would help prove his extraordinary claims. Well, shoot! Practically everyone has been saying that... especially Mr. Rothwell. Nevertheless, what remains unanswered is whether such "obfuscation" was done deliberately and with forethought, or whether the "obfuscation" is due to the fact that Rossi continues to be sloppy in the execution of his demonstrations. While the former conclusion might still be debatable in the minds of many, I suspect few would disagree with the latter conclusion. In any case, it is becoming easier for me to understand why Mr. Krivit apparently reached a personal conclusion: that Rossi must have deliberately and with forethought intentionally obfuscated those details. The point being: when a cynic is confronted with an individual they perceive as having not been forthcoming with them it is natural for them to conclude that they are hiding something. I would imagine that the imagination of a cynic does not often paint a pretty picture of the actions of others, particularly when they have not been given permission to peek under the covers. In all honesty, at present I do not feel I am in a position to conclude as to whether Mr. Krivit's cynicism is serving him well here. I only know that there continue to be strong mitigating factors (and, apparently, strong evidence) that would seem to suggest the distinct possibility that there is something substantial to Rossi's claims. Unfortunately, Rossi continuing to document his "demonstrations" in a manner that causes many to conclude he has done so in a scientifically inadequate way has hindered the inventor's efforts to vindicate his controversial work, and himself. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
