You are correct about the catalyst and the actual core of the ECAT. I was actually referring to the thermal environment and the behavior of the core under operating conditions. This information would prove that the ECAT is generating excess heat for all to see as opposed to now where many question the data.
I suspect that the catalyst will be determined by any company that desires to copy it by opening a unit that they obtain by unsavory means. It will be impossible for anyone to keep this from happening. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Stephen A. Lawrence <sa...@pobox.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wed, Nov 9, 2011 1:33 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Minor progress On 11-11-09 11:37 AM, David Roberson wrote: AG, I think that Horace is giving it a good effort to come up with a scheme to prove it is possible to simulate Rossi's results. That is OK as Rossi has done everything within his ability to confuse the data and leave himself open to serious doubt. I suspect that it is not a coincidence where the output power thermocouple was located. If Rossi had allowed us to have accurate output data, I could have reverse engineered his ECAT quite well. How would you determine what his "secret catalyst" is? Without that ou'll likely be down by an order of magnitude or more from his power evels, and your reverse engineering effort would be a bust. Here's an analogy: If I gave you a catalytic converter from a car to est, and let you measure the temperatures going in and coming out and he gas composition going in and coming out, but you didn't know what as inside, would you be able to determine that it contained platinum nd palladium from the thermal signature? I don't think so. Similarly, don't see how you could figure out what Rossi's catalyst is, just from ccurate thermal data.
