On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Michele Comitini <[email protected]> wrote: > About N.I. involment this is what Daniele reports on 22passi: > > "Questa primavera National Instrument aveva chiesto silenzio sulla sua > disponibilità a "sponsorizzare" l'E-Cat di Rossi, ritenendo ancora > troppo controversa la sua invenzione. Ergo, se National Instrument è > uscita allo scoperto adesso, significa che anche loro hanno escluso > l'ipotesi (campata in aria) della bufala. " > > "Last spring National Instruments asked for not reporting their > availability to "sponsor" Rossi's E-cat, considering his [Rossi's] > invention too controversial. Ergo, if Nat. Instr. came out now, it > means that they too excluded the (too far fetched) hoax hypothesis."
This reminds me of Peter Gluck's question: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg53419.html and AR's mysterious comment on his customer not being who he expected. Is it possible that AR went to NI looking for more than technical help and they concurred? Then AR thought that NI was going to invest by buying his first 1 MW reactor? When in reality, what NI might have done, is contact one of their other customers or partners and suggested that THEY purchase the first reactor? So, who is one of NI's customers that might also be interested in cold fusion related products. Or, energy products in general? T
