> OK Mary, you are correct in realizing that Rossi could be attempting a > fake. Many of his supporters have reviewed the sparse data supplied during > his demonstrations and have convinced ourselves that it is real. I am > confident that we are seeing a real LENR device. >
I'm happy for you, David, but your being convinced doesn't help me a bit. Rossi succeeded in operating a single core ECAT for a length of time that > makes it dificult to be absolutely 100 % certain that it could not be > faked. > Right. Now the game, some atomic bombs are suitcase size and have a small > yield. I perform an underground test of a very large quaintly of > conventional explosives that has a yield equal to the suitcase device that > I show you before I safely lower it into the cavity to be sealed > within. Of course I do not allow you to inspect my setup before the test > or bring your equipment as it is too dangerous for you to enter the > cavity. Who knows, you might break a finger nail or something. ;-) This is > similiar to the proceedure that magicians use when they do their magic. > Uh... that proves my point. AGAIN! That you get the same effect by faking it. And it's what Rossi did in the megawatt demo -- nobody was allowed to see essentially anything. What was the question again? No more games Mary. > What games are those, David?
