Faking experiments is beginning to become boring so let's call it a day. That is the game I made reference to.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Mary Yugo <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, Nov 11, 2011 1:16 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Physorg comments : new Krivit Crusade OK Mary, you are correct in realizing that Rossi could be attempting a fake. Many of his supporters have reviewed the sparse data supplied during his demonstrations and have convinced ourselves that it is real. I am confident that we are seeing a real LENR device. I'm happy for you, David, but your being convinced doesn't help me a bit. Rossi succeeded in operating a single core ECAT for a length of time that makes it dificult to be absolutely 100 % certain that it could not be faked. Right. Now the game, some atomic bombs are suitcase size and have a small yield. I perform an underground test of a very large quaintly of conventional explosives that has a yield equal to the suitcase device that I show you before I safely lower it into the cavity to be sealed within. Of course I do not allow you to inspect my setup before the test or bring your equipment as it is too dangerous for you to enter the cavity. Who knows, you might break a finger nail or something. ;-) This is similiar to the proceedure that magicians use when they do their magic. Uh... that proves my point. AGAIN! That you get the same effect by faking it. And it's what Rossi did in the megawatt demo -- nobody was allowed to see essentially anything. What was the question again? No more games Mary. What games are those, David?
