On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> If Steorn was operating a scam, why have they not been charged? > I don't know. If you look at their history, it's clearly a scam. They also have contempt for their marks because they joke about them tacitly. Perhaps they operate just within Irish law. It could be a rampant scam and still not inherently illegal if they properly warned people ahead that the proposition was high risk. I'm not a lawyer and I don't play one on the internet. Maybe one can comment. I am intrigued by the translation from Kullander. I wonder what he will say. For me, this: "An intensive discussion on the net have questioned the experiment in Bologna mainly by it can not be explained by the established nuclear physics theory. " is important but it's not the main issue. I've already said what the important questions are. I hope Kullander speaks to them. I'm sure he's already had plenty of input from plenty of people!
