I think Steorn stumbled upon a real anomally but they erred in assuming that measurement alone was sufficient to demonstrate the reality of energy creation. Harry
at 9:34 PM, Mary Yugo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Harry Veeder <[email protected]>wrote: > >> If Steorn was operating a scam, why have they not been charged? >> > > I don't know. If you look at their history, it's clearly a scam. They > also have contempt for their marks because they joke about them tacitly. > Perhaps they operate just within Irish law. It could be a rampant scam and > still not inherently illegal if they properly warned people ahead that the > proposition was high risk. I'm not a lawyer and I don't play one on the > internet. Maybe one can comment. > > I am intrigued by the translation from Kullander. I wonder what he will > say. > > For me, this: > > "An intensive discussion on the net have questioned the experiment in > Bologna mainly by it can not be explained by the established nuclear > physics theory. " > > is important but it's not the main issue. I've already said what the > important questions are. I hope Kullander speaks to them. I'm sure he's > already had plenty of input from plenty of people! >
