If you don't read the literature, you won't be able to tell apart what is logical to what is illogical. Besides, I am not a native speaker and gmail's dictionary offered a wrong correction.
2011/11/13 Mary Yugo <[email protected]> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: > >> No time to study the literature but time to nagger and flood forums all >> day with messages. >> > > I have time to study about Rossi and directly related writings. I don't > have time to read the thousands of seemingly inconclusive and difficult > papers Jed would like me to read. The ones he already suggested which I > looked at were extremely and unnecessarily complex and did not convince me > of anything. I am not here to debate cold fusion. I hope it works. I am > here to discuss Rossi's extravagant claims and the lame evidence that he > might be telling the truth and the more convincing evidence that he's not. > What does "nagger" mean as a verb? I never saw the word used that way > before. > > I find most of what believers write to be objectionable and I respond to > it. It is premature to speculate about what the E-cat will do to the world > until we know that it really works and believers simply assume that. And > they are the ones who are the most prolific by far. I just respond > occasionally. > >
