> > If you don't read the literature, you won't be able to tell apart what is > logical to what is illogical.
I disagree. Rossi's claim is different from most of the others in cold fusion because it is so extravagant -- I mean come on! A megawatt for six months on a handful of inexpensive fuel? That's pretty easy to test! It's quantitatively in an entirely different regime from anything claimed before. Although I do read lay announcements about CF in general, reading isn't very helpful in evaluating Rossi's huge claims. Either they stand on their own or they don't. Until they're proven, I don't care in the slightest about how they *might* work. It just couldn't matter less. To me anyway. > Besides, I am not a native speaker and gmail's dictionary offered a wrong > correction. Seems to me your English is excellent. I had no idea you were not a native speaker.
