On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Joshua Cude <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think you misunderstood, I was referring to Rothwell's examples > (radioactivity, fusors etc) as failures to provide practical energy, but > not scams. I was not referring to any of the examples on the web site, > which I also suspect of being scams. > Sorry. Some discussions are harder to follow you. Also, I need to mention that you often write what I'm thinking only better. I find that difficult to bear. But I will be stoic so do continue and thanks.
